The headlines tell us Ukraine successfully struck Russian energy infrastructure “with US help,” and we’re supposed to cheer. Meanwhile, millions of American families are rationing their heating this winter, choosing between groceries and keeping the lights on. Something is profoundly wrong with this picture.
Let’s be clear about what “US help” means in practice. We’re talking about advanced intelligence sharing, satellite data, and sophisticated targeting assistance that costs taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars. This comes on top of the $113 billion Congress has already allocated to Ukraine – money that could have transformed energy policy right here at home.
Consider this: the average American household now spends over $2,000 annually on electricity alone, with heating costs pushing many families into energy poverty. The Energy Information Administration reports that 25% of households have foregone basic necessities to pay energy bills. Yet our government prioritizes helping Ukraine destroy energy infrastructure abroad while our own energy grid crumbles and working families suffer under corporate utility monopolies.
The cruel irony runs deeper. Russia’s energy exports have historically helped stabilize global markets – markets that American workers depend on for affordable heating oil and gasoline. By actively participating in attacks on Russian energy infrastructure, we’re contributing to the very price volatility that’s crushing working-class budgets from Detroit to Seattle.
This isn’t about supporting Putin’s authoritarian regime – it’s about questioning priorities. Every dollar spent on targeting assistance for Ukrainian strikes is a dollar not invested in weatherizing homes, building renewable energy infrastructure, or breaking up the energy cartels that gouge American consumers. The same Pentagon contractors profiting from this proxy war are the ones blocking serious climate action and worker-owned renewable energy cooperatives.
The Biden administration’s approach reveals the fundamental disconnect between Washington’s foreign policy establishment and working people’s daily reality. While they orchestrate complex military operations overseas, 6.1 million American households are behind on utility bills, facing shutoffs that can literally be life-threatening during winter months.
We need to ask uncomfortable questions: Why is there always money for military adventures but never enough for energy justice at home? Why can we provide real-time intelligence for striking power plants in Russia but can’t seem to regulate price-gouging by utility companies in Texas or California?
The answer lies in who holds power and whose interests get prioritized. Defense contractors, energy multinationals, and geopolitical hawks shape policy while ordinary Americans pay the price – literally. This latest escalation represents everything wrong with a foreign policy divorced from domestic needs and class consciousness.
Real energy security means public ownership of utilities, massive investment in renewable infrastructure, and an end to speculation in energy markets. It means choosing energy justice over energy warfare. Until we redirect resources from military interventions toward meeting human needs, working families will continue choosing between heat and food while their tax dollars fund targeting systems for foreign conflicts.
We can build a different world – one where American resources serve American workers first, where energy is treated as a human right rather than a profit center, and where our government’s primary concern is keeping our own people warm, not making other countries colder.
Source: Read the original story
This analysis fundamentally misunderstands both our national security interests and the nature of global energy markets. Supporting Ukraine’s defensive capabilities—including targeting legitimate military infrastructure—serves core American strategic objectives by deterring future aggression that would prove far more costly to address later.
The framing creates a false choice between domestic energy relief and foreign policy commitments. Our energy challenges stem from decades of regulatory dysfunction, infrastructure underinvestment, and market manipulation—not from the $113 billion in Ukrainian aid, which represents roughly 0.4% of federal spending over two years. Meanwhile, Russia’s weaponization of energy exports has repeatedly demonstrated why relying on authoritarian regimes for “market stability” undermines long-term security for American consumers.
The real policy question isn’t whether we should abandon allies facing existential threats, but how we strengthen American energy independence through domestic production, infrastructure modernization, and regulatory reform. Energy security and national security are inseparable—a lesson learned repeatedly throughout our history. Allowing aggressor nations to succeed through intimidation only guarantees higher costs and greater instability ahead. We can simultaneously support our allies and address domestic energy concerns without sacrificing the principles that have secured American prosperity for generations.